Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 's Advantages
Released 7 years late
Boost Clock1239MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
296 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 171W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206 +136%
1.269 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 Rev. 2
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
-
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
512
Shading Units
216
32
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
171W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-B2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy