Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 GM206 vs NVIDIA RTX A400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 GM206 and 4GB VRAM RTX A400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX A400 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 42% (1762MHz vs 1239MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 60W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 GM206
1.269 TFLOPS
RTX A400 +113%
2.706 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Apr 2024
GeForce 700
Generation
Quadro Ampere(Ax000)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1087 MHz
Base Clock
1417 MHz
1239 MHz
Boost Clock
1762 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
6
512
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
24
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

39.65 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.19 GPixel/s
39.65 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.29 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
2.706 TFLOPS
1269 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.706 TFLOPS
39.65 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.29 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GA107
-
-
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
8 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
8.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
200 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.6
6.4
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy