Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 512MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 12.67GB/s)
840 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP 's Advantages
Lower TDP (35W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +1374%
2.108 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2600 PRO AGP
0.143 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
AGP 8x

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
12.67GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
120
80
TMUs
8
24
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.752 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
142.6 GFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

150W
TDP
35W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
RV630
-
GPU Variant
RV630 PRO (215CDBBKA15FG)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy