Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W8100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD FirePro W8100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro W8100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 220W)
AMD FirePro W8100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
1600 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
FirePro W8100 +100%
4.219 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
40
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
2560
80
TMUs
160
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
52.74 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
131.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.219 TFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.109 TFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
220W
450 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Hawaii
-
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL40
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy