Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 45% (1590MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (80W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 1650 TU116 +35%
2.849 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jul 2020
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 16
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
1410 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1590 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
14
960
Shading Units
896
80
TMUs
56
24
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
50.88 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
89.04 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.699 TFLOPS
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.849 TFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
89.04 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
80W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 1x DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
TU116
-
GPU Variant
TU116-150-KA-A1
Kepler
Architecture
Turing
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
6.6 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
284 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
7.5
5.1
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy