Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
744 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (150W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +293%
2.108 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
448bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
960
Shading Units
216
80
TMUs
72
24
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
182W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
-
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GT200
-
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy