Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro WX 3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro WX 3100 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 11% (1219MHz vs 1098MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Lower TDP (65W vs 150W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM +68%
2.108 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro WX 3100
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon Pro Polaris
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
512
80
TMUs
32
24
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
65W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
Lexa XT
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy