Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock1098MHz
Lower TDP (150W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon R9 Nano 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
3136 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti OEM
2.108 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 Nano +288%
8.192 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2015
GeForce 700
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1033 MHz
Base Clock
-
1098 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
256bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
960
Shading Units
4096
80
TMUs
256
24
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.96 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
87.84 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
256.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
2.108 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.192 TFLOPS
87.84 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
512.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

150W
TDP
175W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
1x HDMI 1.4a 3x DisplayPort 1.2
-
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
Fiji
-
GPU Variant
Fiji XT CA (215-0862120)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy