Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 Ti and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 Ti 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
424 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (60W vs 182W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 86.40GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750 Ti +159%
1.389 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1350 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
86.40GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
27
640
Shading Units
216
40
TMUs
72
16
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

60W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT200
GM107-400-A2
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.3
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy