Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI FirePro V7900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs ATI FirePro V7900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 1024MB VRAM GeForce GTX 750 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V7900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (55W vs 150W)
ATI FirePro V7900 's Advantages
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 750
1.111 TFLOPS
FirePro V7900 +67%
1.856 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2014
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1020 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

1024MB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
512
Shading Units
1280
32
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
34.72 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
58.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1111 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.856 TFLOPS
34.72 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
464.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

55W
TDP
150W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x mini-HDMI 2.0
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Cayman
GM107-300-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman PRO GL
Maxwell
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy