Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon HD 2400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and 256MB VRAM ATI Radeon HD 2400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 7.920GB/s)
1112 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2400 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +6293%
2.046 TFLOPS
ATI Radeon HD 2400
0.032 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
888 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
495 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
7.920GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
40
96
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
32 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.592 GPixel/s
85.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
1.592 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
31.84 GFLOPS
85.25 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
20W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV610
GK104-200-KD-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.18 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
85 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy