Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand vs AMD Radeon HD 6250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 6250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock888MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (179.2GB/s vs 8.000GB/s)
1072 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon HD 6250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 130W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand +1867%
2.046 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 6250
0.104 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Jan 2011
GeForce 700
Generation
Northern Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

823 MHz
Base Clock
-
888 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1400 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
179.2GB/s
Bandwidth
8.000GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
80
96
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

21.31 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.600 GPixel/s
85.25 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.200 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
104.0 GFLOPS
85.25 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

130W
TDP
19W
300 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cedar
GK104-200-KD-A2
GPU Variant
Cedar PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
59 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy