Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon X1650

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand vs ATI Radeon X1650

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand and 256MB VRAM Radeon X1650 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM Rebrand 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 6.400GB/s)
1344 additional rendering cores

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2013
Release Date
Nov 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R500 PCIe
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
6.400GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
-
112
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.540 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.540 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

170W
TDP
Unknown
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV516
GK104-325-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ultra-Threaded SE
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.105 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy