Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock980MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
544 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM +163%
2.634 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
800
112
TMUs
40
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
150W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy