Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM vs AMD Radeon R9 285

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 285 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM 's Advantages
Boost Clock980MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 176.0GB/s)
Lower TDP (170W vs 190W)
AMD Radeon R9 285 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
448 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
2.634 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 285 +24%
3.29 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Sep 2014
GeForce 700
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

915 MHz
Base Clock
-
980 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
176.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1344
Shading Units
1792
112
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

27.44 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.38 GPixel/s
109.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
102.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.290 TFLOPS
2.634 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.290 TFLOPS
109.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
205.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
190W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Tonga
-
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO (215-0851128)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
5 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy