Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 vs NVIDIA PG506 232

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 and 24GB VRAM PG506 232 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA PG506 232 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 40% (1440MHz vs 1032MHz)
More VRAM (24GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (933.1GB/s vs 192.3GB/s)
2432 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (165W vs 170W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760
2.378 TFLOPS
PG506 232 +333%
10.32 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2013
Release Date
Apr 2021
GeForce 700
Generation
Tesla
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

980 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1032 MHz
Boost Clock
1440 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1215 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
24GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
256bit
Memory Bus
3072bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
933.1GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
56
1152
Shading Units
3584
96
TMUs
224
32
ROPs
96
-
Tensor Cores
224
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
192 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
24 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.77 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
138.2 GPixel/s
99.07 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
322.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
10.32 TFLOPS
2.378 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
10.32 TFLOPS
99.07 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
5.161 TFLOPS

Board Design

170W
TDP
165W
450 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
8-pin EPS

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GA100
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ampere
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
7 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
54.2 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
826 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
N/A
4.6
OpenGL
N/A
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
8.0
5.1
Shader Model
N/A

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy