Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760 X2 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 X2 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock1072MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.3GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 760 X2 +302%
2.47 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1006 MHz
Base Clock
-
1072 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
256bit
192.3GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
1152
Shading Units
512
96
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.73 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
102.9 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.470 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
102.9 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
75W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
3x DVI 1x mini-DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Cayman
GK104-225-A2
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy