Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX330

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 85% (1594MHz vs 863MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M +8%
1.326 TFLOPS
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Feb 2020
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1531 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
1594 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
1752 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
56.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
768
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
25.50 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
38.26 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
19.13 GFLOPS
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1224 GFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
38.26 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
GP108
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
221 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy