Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 765M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 765M and 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 86% (1605MHz vs 863MHz)
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 64.13GB/s)
1792 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 765M
1.326 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 4050 Max Q +519%
8.218 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jan 2023
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce 40 Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

797 MHz
Base Clock
1140 MHz
863 MHz
Boost Clock
1605 MHz
1002 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
6GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
96bit
64.13GB/s
Bandwidth
192.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
20
768
Shading Units
2560
64
TMUs
80
16
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
80
-
RT Cores
20
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
256 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

13.81 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
77.04 GPixel/s
55.23 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.218 TFLOPS
1326 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.218 TFLOPS
55.23 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
128.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK106
GPU Name
AD107
N14E-GE-B-A1
GPU Variant
GN21-X2
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.54 billion
Transistors
Unknown
221 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy