Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD FireStream 9370

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB vs AMD FireStream 9370

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 6 GB and 4GB VRAM FireStream 9370 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 3 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 147.2GB/s)
704 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9370 's Advantages
Lower TDP (225W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 6 GB +57%
4.156 TFLOPS
FireStream 9370
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Jun 2010
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
1600
192
TMUs
80
48
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
225W
600 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.1
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
Cypress
GK110-301-B1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy