Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs ATI Radeon HD 4250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock902MHz
More VRAM (3GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (288.4GB/s vs 6.336GB/s)
2264 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (25W vs 250W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 +8558%
4.156 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4250
0.048 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2013
Release Date
Feb 2009
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
396 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
384bit
Memory Bus
64bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
6.336GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
40
192
TMUs
4
48
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.376 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.376 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
47.52 GFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

250W
TDP
25W
600 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI 1x VGA 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
RV620
GK110-300-B1
GPU Variant
RV620 LE
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.181 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy