CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4810
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 4810
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
ATI Radeon HD 4810
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4810 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock928MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 57.60GB/s)
2240 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4810 's Advantages
Lower TDP (95W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
+568%
5.345 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4810
0.8 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
VS
Radeon HD 4810
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2009
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
875 MHz
Base Clock
-
928 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
128bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
2880
Shading Units
640
240
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.000 GPixel/s
222.7 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.345 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
800.0 GFLOPS
222.7 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
160.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
RV770
-
GPU Variant
RV770 CE (215-0669093)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
95W
600 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce GT 1030 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950
5
NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
6
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060 AD106 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs AMD Radeon 550X
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 Ti 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 TU116
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy