Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs AMD FirePro S9170

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 vs AMD FirePro S9170

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 3GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780 and 32GB VRAM FirePro S9170 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780 's Advantages
Boost Clock902MHz
Lower TDP (250W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro S9170 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 2 months late
More VRAM (32GB vs 3GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 288.4GB/s)
512 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780
4.156 TFLOPS
FirePro S9170 +26%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Jul 2015
GeForce 700
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

863 MHz
Base Clock
-
902 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

3GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
384bit
Memory Bus
512bit
288.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2304
Shading Units
2816
192
TMUs
176
48
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

43.30 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
173.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.156 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
173.2 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

250W
TDP
275W
600 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110
GPU Name
Hawaii
GK110-300-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii XT GL
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.2
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy