Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition vs AMD Radeon R5 M255

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition and 2GB VRAM Radeon R5 M255 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R5 M255 's Advantages
Released 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (940MHz vs 797MHz)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780M Mac Edition +239%
2.448 TFLOPS
Radeon R5 M255
0.721 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2013
Release Date
Oct 2014
GeForce 700M
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
925 MHz
797 MHz
Boost Clock
940 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.520 GPixel/s
102.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
22.56 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
721.9 GFLOPS
2.448 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
721.9 GFLOPS
102.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
45.12 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
Topaz
N14E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
Topaz PRO (216-0858030)
Kepler
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.1
Vulkan
1.2.170
3.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy