Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 780M and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 780M 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1152 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1038MHz vs 797MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 780M +207%
2.448 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 780M +150%
180
GeForce MX250
72
OctaneBench
GeForce GTX 780M +31%
29
GeForce MX250
22
VS

Graphics Card

May 2013
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 700M
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

771 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
797 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
3
1536
Shading Units
384
128
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
102.0 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
2.448 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
102.0 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
GP108B
N14E-GTX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Pascal
TSMC
Foundry
Samsung
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
6.1
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy