Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 880M vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 880M and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 9 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 102% (2010MHz vs 993MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 160.0GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (50W vs 122W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 880M
3.05 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +304%
12.35 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2014
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 800M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

954 MHz
Base Clock
1530 MHz
993 MHz
Boost Clock
2010 MHz
1250 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
160.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1536
Shading Units
3072
128
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.78 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
96.48 GPixel/s
127.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
193.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
12.35 TFLOPS
3.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.35 TFLOPS
127.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

122W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GK104
GPU Name
AD107
N15E-GX-A2
GPU Variant
-
Kepler
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
3.54 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
294 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.1
Vulkan
1.3
3.0
CUDA
8.9
5.1
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy