NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Intel Arc A310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 4GB VRAM Arc A310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
Intel Arc A310 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 47% (1750MHz vs 1190MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (124.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Arc A310
+47%
2.688 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
179
Arc A310
+191%
521
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Alchemist
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1750 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
1750 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1937 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
124.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
768
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.00 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
56.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
5.376 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.688 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
672.0 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
DG2-128
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Generation 12.7
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
