Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FirePro V3900

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FirePro V3900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM FirePro V3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
288 additional rendering cores
ATI FirePro V3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +192%
1.828 TFLOPS
FirePro V3900
0.624 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2012
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
480
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
624.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x DisplayPort 1.1
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Turks
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy