Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 1024MB VRAM GeForce GT 320 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.28GB/s)
696 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce GT 320 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (43W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +872%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GT 320 OEM
0.188 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 300
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.28GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
9
768
Shading Units
72
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.320 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.96 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
187.5 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
43W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT215
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
GT215-250-A2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.727 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.2
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy