Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 295 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 896GB)
528 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 289W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 295 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (111.9GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +206%
1.828 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 295
0.596 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2009
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
448bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
30
768
Shading Units
240
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
28
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
46.08 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
596.2 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.52 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
289W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
GT200B
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
G200-401-B3
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
470 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.3
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy