NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S3000
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 32GB VRAM Moore Threads MTT S3000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
Moore Threads MTT S3000 's Advantages
More VRAM (32GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
Moore Threads MTT S3000
+751%
15.56 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1900 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
32GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
486.4 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
486.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
31.13 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
15.56 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.2 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
250W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
22 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
