NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs Moore Threads MTT S80
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 16GB VRAM MTT S80 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Boost Clock1190MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 255W)
Moore Threads MTT S80 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
1.828 TFLOPS
MTT S80
+706%
14.75 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2023
GeForce 900
Generation
MUSA-Chunxiao
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 5.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
1800 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
0 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
448.0GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
32
-
SM Count
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
256
-
Tensor Cores
-
RT Cores
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
460.8 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
460.8 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
29.49 TFLOPS
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
14.75 TFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
230.4 GFLOPS
Board Design
75W
TDP
255W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.1
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
MTT Gen 2
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
MUSA-Chunxiao
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
12 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
22 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
Unknown
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.4
5.2
CUDA
6.4
Shader Model
6.5
