NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+988%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
3
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
75W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI
1x HDMI 2.0
3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
RV630
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
