CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
648 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (45W vs 75W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
+988%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
0.168 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
VS
Radeon HD 2600 XT Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Mar 2016
Release Date
Feb 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R600
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
3
768
Shading Units
120
48
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.800 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.600 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
168.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GM206
GPU Name
RV630
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.39 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
153 mm²
Board Design
75W
TDP
45W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.0 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon HD 7750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
2
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
3
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti 8 GB GA102 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 750 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti GDDR6X
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 Ti OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM
Related News
1
Apple's 2025 OS in Development: iOS 19 Codename 'Luck'
2
Apple's AI is Memory Hungry! The Entire iPhone 16 Lineup Comes with 8GB RAM
3
Noctua Announce NH-D15 G2 Air Cooler and NF-A14x25r G2 Fan
4
The P-Cores and E-Cores in Arrow Lake Will Be Interleaved, Reducing Core Communication Latency and Improving Heat Dissipation
5
Changes in Intel Arrow Lake P/E Core Layout: Two Major Benefits
6
Time to Step Up, AMD and Intel! Nvidia Faces Antitrust Lawsuits in France, US, and EU
7
Intel Arrow Lake-S Features Dual Direct M.2 Slots: One PCIe 5.0 x4 and One PCIe 4.0 x4
8
AMD Ryzen 9000X3D Series to Feature Fully Unlocked Overclocking; DDR5-6400: The 'Sweet Spot' for Zen 5 Memory Speeds
9
Intel Z890 Motherboard Specs Leaked: Farewell to DDR4 Memory
10
AMD Ryzen 9000 Series Now Available for Pre-order in Europe: 9950X Priced at €660, Shipping by August 2
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy