Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI FireMV 2250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 256MB VRAM FireMV 2250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 9 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 12.80GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (32W vs 75W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2007
GeForce 900
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
400 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR2
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
12.80GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
-
48
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.400 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.400 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
32W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x S-Video 1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV516
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
R500
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
80 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.107 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
100 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
9.0c (9_3)
4.6
OpenGL
2.1
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
3.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy