Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 4855

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs ATI Radeon HD 4855

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4855 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1190MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (75W vs 110W)
ATI Radeon HD 4855 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +148%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4855
0.736 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
-
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
640
48
TMUs
32
32
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
9.200 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
18.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
736.0 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
147.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
110W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.3a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
RV770
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO (215-0669065)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy