Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R7 240

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power vs AMD Radeon R7 240

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 Low Power and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 240 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 Low Power 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 53% (1190MHz vs 780MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
448 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 240 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 Low Power +266%
1.828 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 240
0.499 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2016
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 900
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1026 MHz
Base Clock
730 MHz
1190 MHz
Boost Clock
780 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
320
48
TMUs
20
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.240 GPixel/s
57.12 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
15.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.828 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
499.2 GFLOPS
57.12 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
30W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Oland
GM206-251-A1
GPU Variant
Oland PRO (215-0837015)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy