CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7100
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7100
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
AMD FirePro W7100
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1203MHz
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100
+33%
3.297 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
VS
FirePro W7100
Graphics Card
Jan 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1203 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz
Memory
4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
28
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
Theoretical Performance
38.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
76.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
2.464 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
76.99 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GM206S
GPU Name
Tonga
950 OEM
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
3dfx Voodoo4-2 4200 AGP vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
3
AMD Radeon RX 580 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 645M
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 660 Rev. 2 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
7
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA TITAN RTX
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs ATI Radeon HD 2400 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs NVIDIA GeForce 9300 GS Rev. 2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy