Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD FirePro W7100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM and 8GB VRAM FirePro W7100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1203MHz
AMD FirePro W7100 's Advantages
More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
FirePro W7100 +33%
3.297 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1203 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1792
64
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.44 GPixel/s
76.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
103.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.297 TFLOPS
2.464 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.297 TFLOPS
76.99 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
206.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
150W
200 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Tonga
950 OEM
GPU Variant
Tonga PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy