Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM vs AMD Radeon Pro W6400

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 OEM and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro W6400 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 OEM 's Advantages
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon Pro W6400 's Advantages
Released 6 years late
Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2331MHz vs 1203MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 OEM
2.464 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro W6400 +45%
3.58 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x4

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
2331 MHz
1203 MHz
Boost Clock
2331 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
768
64
TMUs
48
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
12
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB per Array
1024 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
L3 Cache
8 MB

Theoretical Performance

38.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
74.59 GPixel/s
76.99 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
111.9 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
7.161 TFLOPS
2.464 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.580 TFLOPS
76.99 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
223.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
50W
200 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
No outputs
Outputs
2x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Navi 24
950 OEM
GPU Variant
Navi 24 XL-W
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
RDNA 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
6 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.4 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
107 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy