Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro D500

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro D500

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 3GB VRAM FirePro D500 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 274W)
AMD FirePro D500 's Advantages
More VRAM (3GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (243.8GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro D500 +22%
2.227 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1270 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
3GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
243.8GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
24
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1536
48
TMUs
96
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.20 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
69.60 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.227 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
556.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
274W
250 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x SDI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tahiti
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti LE GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy