Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro S9050

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro S9050

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 12GB VRAM FirePro S9050 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 1 years late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 225W)
AMD FirePro S9050 's Advantages
More VRAM (12GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (264.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1024 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro S9050 +76%
3.226 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1375 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
12GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
384bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
264.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1792
48
TMUs
112
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
768 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
28.80 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
100.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.226 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
806.4 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
225W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.2
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Tahiti
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Tahiti PRO GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
4.313 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
352 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy