Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD FirePro S9300 X2

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 4GB VRAM FirePro S9300 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 300W)
AMD FirePro S9300 X2 's Advantages
Released 7 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro S9300 X2 +337%
7.987 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Mar 2016
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM
128bit
Memory Bus
4096bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
62.40 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
249.6 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
7.987 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
499.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
300W
250 W
Suggested PSU
700 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Capsaicin
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Capsaicin XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
8.9 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
596 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy