Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V8800

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs ATI FirePro V8800

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V8800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 4 months late
Boost Clock1188MHz
Lower TDP (90W vs 208W)
ATI FirePro V8800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (147.2GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
832 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
FirePro V8800 +44%
2.64 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Apr 2010
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
-
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1150 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
147.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
20
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
1600
48
TMUs
80
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
26.40 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
66.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.640 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
528.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
208W
250 W
Suggested PSU
550 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.1 1x S-Video
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Cypress
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Cypress XT GL
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.154 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
334 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy