Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon Pro V7300X

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 8GB VRAM Radeon Pro V7300X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 130W)
AMD Radeon Pro V7300X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1243MHz vs 1188MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (224.0GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro V7300X +213%
5.728 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Radeon Pro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
1188 MHz
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
1243 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
224.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
36
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
2304
48
TMUs
144
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
39.78 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
179.0 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.728 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
358.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
130W
250 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Ellesmere
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Ellesmere XT
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy