Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 250 OEM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 13% (1188MHz vs 1050MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (105.8GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 250 OEM 's Advantages
Lower TDP (65W vs 90W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950 +126%
1.825 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 250 OEM
0.806 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Oct 2013
GeForce 900
Generation
Volcanic Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
1000 MHz
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
1050 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
384
48
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.400 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.20 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
806.4 GFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
50.40 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
65W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x VGA
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Oland
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Oland XT (215-0837000)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy