Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 950 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 950 's Advantages
Lower TDP (90W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1546MHz vs 1188MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 105.8GB/s)
3328 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 950
1.825 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +593%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Aug 2015
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1024 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1188 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1653 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
105.8GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
768
Shading Units
4096
48
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.02 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
57.02 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
1.825 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
57.02 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

90W
TDP
175W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Vega 10
GM206-250-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy