Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 OEM vs NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 OEM and 20GB VRAM RTX 4000 Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 4000 Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 81% (2175MHz vs 1201MHz)
More VRAM (20GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (360.0GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
5120 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960 OEM
2.46 TFLOPS
RTX 4000 Ada Generation +986%
26.73 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2015
Release Date
Aug 2023
GeForce 900
Generation
Quadro Ada(x000A)
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1176 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
1201 MHz
Boost Clock
2175 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
2250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
20GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
128bit
Memory Bus
160bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
360.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
48
1024
Shading Units
6144
64
TMUs
192
32
ROPs
80
-
Tensor Cores
192
-
RT Cores
48
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
48 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

38.43 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
174.0 GPixel/s
76.86 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
417.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
26.73 TFLOPS
2.460 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
26.73 TFLOPS
76.86 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
417.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
130W
200 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
No outputs
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
1x 16-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
AD104
GTX 960 OEM
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
35.8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
294 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.7
Shader Model
6.8

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy