Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 vs AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960 and 8GB VRAM Radeon RX Vega Nano to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960 's Advantages
Lower TDP (120W vs 175W)
AMD Radeon RX Vega Nano 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 31% (1546MHz vs 1178MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (409.6GB/s vs 112.2GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960
2.413 TFLOPS
Radeon RX Vega Nano +424%
12.66 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2015
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 900
Generation
Vega
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1127 MHz
Base Clock
1247 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1546 MHz
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
112.2GB/s
Bandwidth
409.6GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

37.70 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
98.94 GPixel/s
75.39 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
395.8 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.413 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.66 TFLOPS
75.39 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
791.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

120W
TDP
175W
300 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x HDMI 2.0b 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM206
GPU Name
Vega 10
GM206-300-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy