Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1350MHz vs 1085MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3456 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960A
1.389 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +696%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 900A
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
4096
40
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Vega 10
N16P-GX-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy