Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960A and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960A 's Advantages
Boost Clock1085MHz
Lower TDP (75W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960A
1.389 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition +168%
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 900A
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1029 MHz
Base Clock
-
1085 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
-
-
-
640
Shading Units
2048
40
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

17.36 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
43.40 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
1389 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
43.40 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

75W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
Amethyst
N16P-GX-A1
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 3.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
5 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy