Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M vs NVIDIA NVS 2100M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 960M and 512MB VRAM NVS 2100M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 960M 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1176MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 12.64GB/s)
624 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 2100M 's Advantages
Lower TDP (11W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 960M +3758%
1.505 TFLOPS
NVS 2100M
0.039 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2010
GeForce 900M
Generation
NVS Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-B (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1097 MHz
Base Clock
-
1176 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
790 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
12.64GB/s

Render Config

-
SM Count
2
-
Compute Units
-
640
Shading Units
16
40
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB

Theoretical Performance

18.82 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.140 GPixel/s
47.04 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.280 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
1.505 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
39.36 GFLOPS
47.04 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GM107
GPU Name
GT218
N16P-GX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.87 billion
Transistors
0.26 billion
148 mm²
Die Size
57 mm²

Board Design

75W
TDP
11W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
-
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
11.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.0
CUDA
1.2
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy